For the practitioner who wants to see a remedy as one dynamic argument rather than a list of symptoms: Per Neesgaard’s Hypothesis Collection, subtitled Primary Psora and Miasmatic Dynamic.
Each remedy is worked out by the method of Alfonso Masi Elizalde, an Argentinian physician. Each analysis sets out a hypothesis to explain the remedy’s Primary Psora and miasmatic dynamic. The 2019 edition holds 120 remedy analyses and 373 differential diagnoses, and Neesgaard adds examples of the problems to be aware of for the remedies concerned.
The extract on the UK page shows the thinking with Nat-m.: anxiety after a meal is a Psoric symptom, while indifference to food may be Egotrophic or Egolytic depending on the reason behind it. Neesgaard argues, after Hahnemann, that a remedy picture has to move the way the patient’s disturbance moves.
It suits the practitioner who works by tracing a case back to its Primary Psora. Check what your package already includes on the package comparison before adding it.
